Comparative Analysis of Existing Methods and Algorithms for Automatic Assignment of Reviewers to Papers
نویسندگان
چکیده
The article focuses on the importance of the automatic assignment of reviewers to papers for increasing the assignment accuracy the quality of the scientific event itself. It discusses the main aspects that influence the assignment accuracy, performs a detailed analysis of the methods of describing papers and reviewers competences used by the existing conference management systems and suggests some improvements in the way the similarity factors are calculated.
منابع مشابه
Automatizing the Assignment of the Submitted Manuscripts to Reviewers: A Systematic Review of Research Texts
Purpose: To systematicly review the automatazation of the assignment of the submitted manuscripts to reviewers in order to identify the status of research studies in this field in terms of types of evidence of expertise, types of retrieval models used, and the research gaps, and finally some suggestions for has been offered for future research. Method: The current research followed the systema...
متن کاملمعیارهای عینی و دهنی داوران در داوری مقالات چاپ و یا رد شده مجله مدیریت سلامت: سال‌های 92-90
Introduction: Peer-review is one of the important pre-publication steps for academic papers. It usually assures the readers about the high-quality reporting of scientific findings. Since objective and subjective criteria used by the reviewers are effective factors on the quality of journal, this study aims to assess these criteria for the accepted and rejected manuscripts of Journal Health Admi...
متن کاملK-Loop Free Assignment in Conference Review Systems
Peer review is a common process for evaluating paper submissions and selecting high-quality papers at academic conferences. A significant task is assigning submissions to appropriate reviewers. Considering the constraints of reviewers, papers, and conflicts of interest, retrieval-based methods and assignment-based methods were proposed in previous works. However, an author could also be a revie...
متن کاملA Topic-based Reviewer Assignment System
Peer reviewing is a widely accepted mechanism for assessing the quality of submitted articles to scientific conferences or journals. Conference management systems (CMS) are used by conference organizers to invite appropriate reviewers and assign them to submitted papers. Typical CMS rely on paper bids entered by the reviewers and apply simple matching algorithms to compute the paper assignment....
متن کاملArchitecture of a Conference Management System Providing Advanced Paper Assignment Features
This paper proposes an architecture and assignment management model of a conference management system that performs a precise and accurate automatic assignment of reviewers to papers. The system relies on taxonomy of keywords to describe papers and reviewers’ competences. The implied hierarchical structure of the taxonomy provides important additional information – the semantic relationships be...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1012.2019 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010